(2003), and was designed to evaluate “the brand new selection of attributes that each specialist enforce in almost any psychotherapeutic problem, hence framing the main top features of the fresh therapeutic work” (p. 117). The latest questionnaire analyzes four other dimensions: flexibility-tightness (Educational subscale), distance-intimacy (Expressive subscale), less involvement-higher wedding (Involvement subscale), greater focused-slim focused (Attentional subscale) and you can natural-organized (Surgical subscale). This is certainly a thirty-six-product mind-declaration scale done by the therapists that have answers rated into the a good measure between step 1 (complete argument)to help you seven (complete agreement). The fresh new scale indicates a test-retest precision regarding .79, that have Chronbach’s accuracy coefficients for each and every subscale, the following; instructional, .69; expressive, .75; involvement, .78; attentional, .80; surgical, .78. Basis Study found a beneficial KMO = .756 (Discover Table step one for alphas in the present study).
Doing work Alliance Catalog-Quick Setting (WAI-S)
The working Alliance Collection (WAI), created by Horvath Greenberg (1986), try an excellent 36 goods survey which are often applied so you can one another customers and you can practitioners in fact it is ranked towards good seven-part Likert types of scale from1 (never)in order to seven (always). Tracey and you can Kokotovic (1989) recommended a consumer and you may counselor Working Alliance Inventory-Small Mode (WAI-S), that contains four issues each subscale (Activity, Purpose, and you will Bond) and you will complete WAI-S results, indicating large precision that have leader levels exactly like, and also much better than the new WAI towards specialist subscales and you may total mediocre score (Task, leader = .83; Thread, leader = .91; Mission, leader = .88; and you will Standard Alliance, alpha = .95). Get a hold of Dining table step 1 having alphas in the modern data.
Process Listing (TL)
The strategy Number size was modified regarding Hollis (1995), exactly who catalogued a comprehensive directory of counseling and you can therapy process symbolizing a broad spectrum of philosophical angles. In order to hone that it comprehensive checklist based on procedure utilized especially because of the cognitive behavioural and constructivist procedures orientations, i recruited counseling mindset scholar children to see the full listing of 108 medication procedure and you may rate the newest the quantity to which for each technique is employed by for each and every healing method (intellectual behavioral and you will constructivist), having fun with a great 5-area Likert sorts https://datingranking.net/es/citas-vietnamita/ of size from a single (Never ever otherwise Hardly ever) so you’re able to 5 (Always or Typically).
Steps
Sixteen counseling psychology graduate students participated in these ratings (six men, 10 women), with the Mage = (SD = 2.67). Results of a paired differences analysis for all 108 items indicated that there were 77 techniques rated as being used with significantly differential frequency by cognitive behavioral and constructivist therapies. We then divided this distribution of 77 techniques into quartiles and retained the top and bottom quartiles. This resulted in 20 cognitive behavioral techniques (e.g.advice giving, rational restructuring) and 20 constructivist techniques (e.g. emotional processing, reflection) that were rated most significantly different (cognitive behavioral vs. constructivist). This final list of 40 items of therapy techniques (20 cognitive behavioral techniques; 20 constructivist techniques) was used in the current study.
These forty factors was noted alphabetically and users was indeed asked so you can speed the brand new the quantity that they use for each and every approach inside their habit of therapy collectively a 5-point size from just one (Never ever otherwise Almost never)to 5 (Always or Almost always). The brand new studies of your own 20 rationalist factors was in fact summed and a great mean is actually determined so you can echo an average regularity of using rationalist interventions (you are able to variety = 1-5), as well as the same processes was utilized in relation to the 20 constructivist treatments.
Brand new intense data was utilized so you’re able to run an effective confirmatory basis studies towards the Procedure List scale. The current studies is checked-out getting multi-variate normalcy plus the presumptions was basically fulfilled. All kurtosis estimates on parameters fell anywhere between step 1 and you may –step 1 details except constructivist affairs a dozen, 13, sixteen, and you will 20 and cognitive behavioral product step three, which had a great kurtosis values between 2 and –dos. Thus, this type of five points were taken off the fresh scale in advance of running the confirmatory basis analysis.
